Enabling a Women's Entrepreneurship Framework
"We are farmers by background. We grow and sell soya, harabhara and wheat. We sell in the local markets here near our village. A year back, madam ji my wife was very...
READ MORE
The Twenty First Century belong to India. Though most populous in the world, she is the youngest country with over 65% of the population below the age of 35. While this is an advantage for the aspiring India that aims to be a developed country by the year 2047, we cannot forget the greatest responsibility that we all have towards the creating a sustainable nation.
Sustainability does not just mean protecting just the
environment but encompasses 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as
envisaged by Niti Ayog. These SDGs are getting percolated into Indian
corporates through RBI, SEBI and other institutions who gives policy
directions. In this article, we explore the recent trends, challenges and
possible solutions faced across Indian companies.
These regulatory changes have started showing the
initiatives taken by Indian Companies.
Though the path to achieve SDGs is long, rough, and tough for the Indian Corporates, we are witnessing positive changes in their behavior:
In line with the emerging trends and awareness of
sustainability, we can see swift developments in the market that would hasten
the progress at the Indian Companies:
It is no more a secret that we are witnessing climate change that could bring man-made disasters across the world, no more a secret that discrimination among the human races continue unabated, no more a secret that the gap between the rich and the poor are increasing, no more a secret that no amount of regulations can stop greedy corporates to evade corporate governance standards and so on.
Unless a coordinated action plan is taken by all the
countries of the world in a measured manner, we cannot improve sustainability
of nations. While every political leader agrees with this and trying to be
politically correct, withing each region there are serious differences in the
approach are emerging.
For example, in the United States, at least 40 anti-ESG laws have been enacted in 18 states which includes
Anti-ESG investing laws seeking to limit the ability of public entities (such as state-sponsored pension plans) to consider ESG-related factors in their investment decisions,
Anti-boycott laws authorizing a blacklist of financial entities that engage in “boycotts” of companies involved in industries such as fossil fuels or firearms,
Contracting restrictions that prohibit contracts with state entities absent verification that the counterparty does not and will not boycott companies in specified industries, such as fossil fuels, timber, mining, agriculture, or firearms, and
Anti-discrimination laws that prohibit state entities or insurers from using social credit or ESG scores.
But some states, like California and New York, are forging ahead with more disclosures on ESG
Whereas the EU adopted a new European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) with effect from 1st January 2024.
The most important change this standard will bring is a new
approach to reporting. Under the principle of “double materiality,” a
topic will be material (and thus require reporting) if either (i) it could
reasonably be expected to affect the company’s cash flows, access to financing,
or cost of capital over the short, medium, or long-term (so- called
“financial materiality”) or (ii) the impact of the company’s operations
and/or value chains on people or the environment (relating to the relevant
reporting item such as pollution, water resources, biodiversity, workforce,
etc.) is material (“impact materiality”). This framework reflects a
significant shift, particularly for U.S. issuers accustomed to reporting
under financial materiality standards.
1. Other than few 100
companies in India, most companies feels that BRSR is just a compliance matter
and have not paid much attention. This is visible from the contents of
BRSR filings.
2. Corporate Boards are
not spending quality time in linking their corporate and business strategy with
ESG. Leadership teams are not thinking broadly enough about how the macro
forces shaping society would eventually impact the business landscape.
3. Many Boards are yet
to adopt ESG policies or form ESG committees due to confusion with CSR
committee while there is overlap with other committees, like Corporate
Governance, Risk, etc.
4. Individual Directors
either lack training on ESG or people with relevant experience not inducted
into the Board.
5. Companies have not
clearly identified material issues and established verifiable data collection
in a methodical manner. Most data sit in isolation that becomes difficult to
report on a consistent basis.
6. Many small and
medium-sized companies feel that cost of ESG implementation is prohibitive.
7. Availability of
skilled ESG professionals is a real hurdle for internal recruitment.
Outsourcing ESG would pose serious challenges as it would lack accountability.
8. Lack of
cost-effective financing options to implement ESG standards is a hurdle.
India is in the nascent stages of ESG adaptation. Hence, it is important to create an ecosystem and all connected institutions should work together in addressing the challenges. Companies can explore some measures suggested below in a timely manner :
1. Review and evaluate
the capabilities of board members and induct Independent Directors who have
worked in environment related or social fields with business acumen.
2. Board should
brainstorm and should feel the need for concerted action which would help in
formulating deliverable policies and strategies. It would be futile to go all
hog and waste resources.
3. Review the business
model to identify high risk products or processes that would become a
hot-potato and phase them out. Alternatively, take action to mitigate the
negative effects.
4. Do not outsource the
entire ESG work as such decisions are not sustainable. It is possible to
take help of consultants who could help in structuring the policies, strategies
and provide tech platform or train the organization to ensure data integrity.
Ultimately, the organization should adopt inherently.
5. Identify key areas
where investment would be required to achieve the targets in the order of
priority. Example – converting coal fired boilers to greener options, or
wind/solar energy that would not only justify investments but also help in
reaching the targets.
6. Create a small but
effective board monitored internal team with a dashboard to report. Involve key
operational people who have decision making skills.
7. Board should keep ESG
as one of their agenda every quarter until such time they are satisfied with
the outcome.
8. Continuously engage
with suppliers and service providers to explore innovative options. Sometimes,
hard decisions would become necessary to eliminate players who could create
harm.
9. Explore cost
effective financing options if the investment is beyond the available means.
10. Incentivize the supply chain and all internal players for achieving the targets. Entire organization should gear up to implement and reap the fruits of ESG policies.
While the world and its players could have varying views on ESG, India cannot slow peddle on the key issues affecting our humanity. We must remember that we are the largest populated country in the world, and we have a collective responsibility to leave the legacy of sustainable future for our future generations.
Having said this, it is important not to bow down to imposed unfair / unrealistic standards by developed countries that could jeopardize our system.
Historically and culturally, Indians had a value system that protected our environment, our people, and the entire society. We just need to get back to our traditional value systems except that now they are called in various names like ESGs, SDGs, etc.